 |
Keith is a division
president whom I coached many years
ago. Now he was calling me about
Sondra, his new head of sales and
marketing.
“Working with her is a roller
coaster. Some days she seems
fine then five minutes later
she’s pouting or crying or
angry. I really need her to
level out and stop the drama.”
I laughed hearing this from
Keith. When he and I had worked
together, the goal for his
coaching had been for him to
warm up. His boss, the CEO,
valued relationships highly. But
Keith had succeeded because of
his intellectual horsepower, not
his interpersonal skills. During
his coaching, Keith had made
significant strides in the realm
of relationships and feelings,
but that territory was never
going to be completely
comfortable for him. Now he had
to manage Sondra, who seemed to
live in that world excessively.
How ironic.
During my first session with
Sondra, she went on at length
about Keith. “He’s the coldest
fish I’ve ever worked for. I
know I’m expressive and
passionate—that’s why I’m good
at what I do!—but, I swear, the
minute I get excited about
something, he shuts down like
there’s some bad smell in the
room. I think he wants us all
running around like little
robots.”
I smiled inwardly. The
conversation I was going to have
with Sondra about Keith was
almost the exact same
conversation I’d had years
before with Keith about his
boss. Here’s the short version:
Your boss is your biggest
customer. Period.
Early in his coaching, Keith had
struggled to overcome his
resistance to chat.
Intellectually he understood
that Chuck, his boss, prized
unstructured chatting prior to
diving into data. But whenever
he got in the room, Keith’s
natural style would take over
and he’d launch into his numbers
without preamble. “I am who I
am,” he used to tell me
helplessly.
“And Chuck is who he is,” I’d
reply. “And he’s your boss. And
he’s asking you to do something
different.” I paused. “If this
were a client you were courting,
you’d make the change.”
“At least until we landed him,”
he conceded sheepishly.
And that’s one of the core
problems. We think because we
have our jobs we can stop
attending to our bosses’ needs.
But if you have direct reports,
you know that’s not true. You
expect your direct reports to
give you information the way you
want it, don’t you? And when
they don’t, it annoys you,
doesn’t it? Isn’t it amazing
that we expect one thing from
the people reporting to us but
don’t apply those same
expectations to ourselves in
relation to our bosses?
This issue of matching styles is
only one of the ways you need to
be adept at managing your boss.
John Kotter and John Gabarro, in
their Harvard Business Review
article, “Managing Your Boss,”
mention a broad range of things
you need to know in order to
manage your boss effectively.
They write:
At a minimum, you need
to appreciate your
boss’s:
 |
Goals and pressures; |
 |
Strengths and
weaknesses, long suits and
blind spots; |
 |
Organizational and
personal objectives; |
 |
Pressures, especially
those from his or her own
boss and others at
the same level; |
 |
Preferred style of
working; |
 |
Preference for receiving
information, e.g., memos,
formal
meetings,
phone calls, etc.; |
 |
Tolerance or avoidance
of conflict. |
Would you be able to
address all those points about
your boss? Most people can’t.
And that list, say Kotter and
Gabarro, is what you should know
“at a minimum”!
“Without this information,” they
continue, “a manager is flying
blind when dealing with the
boss, and unnecessary conflicts,
misunderstandings, and problems
are inevitable.” Inevitable?
Ouch!
That article caused quite a stir
when it was originally published
in 1993. The topic remains so
important, the article was
updated and republished in 2005.
Over the years so many reprints
have been requested that the
Harvard Business Review has
named it one of their Classics.
It’s an important read. To
order an
electronic download of it for a
nominal fee
click here.
Keith and Sondra both worked to
address the points in Kotter and
Gabarro’s article. They also
worked hard to manage
themselves—perhaps the toughest
task facing every leader. Over
time, their adapted styles
became more natural and they
found they had expanded their
style repertoire. That expansion
of The Look & Sound of LeadershipTM made them more
effective senior leaders—and it
certainly helped them manage
their bosses better. Follow
their lead.
|
 |